The Baltimore Catechism

baltcat3 b The Baltimore Catechism
The Baltimore Catechism

This is the time of the year that parish-based educational ministries are starting up again.

The Baltimore Catechism is a time-tested and proven-effective resource to put at the core of a religious education curriculum.  The three books cover First Communicants learning the basics of the faith through high schoolers getting ready for Confirmation.  It can also be excellent supplementary material used in conjunction with an existing program, or, for one’s independent enrichment.

Even adult students who haven’t been in school for a number of years can benefit from this series as the lessons are presented in a clear and concise question-and-answer format that facilitates learning.  It makes sure to incorporate Church Doctrine, Sacred Scripture, and practical application for a thorough understanding of the lesson.

 Around since 1885, The Baltimore Catechism is the trusted name in teaching about Catholicism. 

 

noname47 b Archbishop Jose Gomez

Men of Brave Heart

by Archbishop Gomez

You already know he’s the Coadjutor Archbishop of Los Angeles–which means he’ll take over the largest Catholic diocese in the United States after native Los Angelean Cardinal Roger Mahony retires on his 75th birthday.  In addition to being the first Hispanic to serve this diocese comprised of 2/3 Hispanics, he will become the highest ranking Hispanic bishop in the country.  He is also from the conservative and often misunderstood organization Opus Dei–which came under scrutiny due to some unfair depictions in popular culture.

So what does Archbishop Gomez have in store for our neck of the woods?  Well, take a sneak-peak at what this man is all about.  His book, Men of Brave Heart: The Virtue of Courage in the Priestly Life, takes a close look at the Biblical and Traditional history of the vocation of the priesthood.  It contains many real-life stories of saints, martyrs, and modern day priests and their remarkable examples of the highs and lows of this calling.

An inspiring read for priests, seminarians, and those in discernment, it also gives us an idea of the great regard Archbishop Gomez has for his centuries-old, noble vocation–a sign of how he will lead those priests who will soon come under his authority.

 

While we were serving breakfast outside our parish’s rummage sale, we saw our pastor hobbling towards our booth from the church.  He had just finished hearing Confessions.  As he neared, we noted that he looked exhausted and visibly distraught.  He wearily asked for some food, something with protein in it.  We gave him a plate of scrambled eggs, which he ate up quickly.

“Father,” we asked him, “does hearing Confessions take a lot out of you?” Implying the spiritual, emotional, and even physical aspects of it.

He managed a smile between bites.  “Yes it does.”  He wiped his mouth and continued with an analogy.  “A priest friend of mine, who had already passed, explained it like this: ‘It’s like getting stoned to death with marshmallows.’”

His friend was most likely referencing Archbishop Fulton Sheen’s quip about how hearing a nun’s Confession is like being stoned to death with popcorn.  (Or, perhaps, it was his friend who gave it to the late great Archbishop and now Servant of God–or, his friend WAS Archbishop Sheen, which would be way cooler.  Or, it’s just one of those industry inside-jokes…?)

I both do and don’t get this analogy.  I suppose it means our priests are expressing their immunity towards the sins we hurl at them.  No matter how gnarly the things we let fly, it bounces right off them and they forgive us because God forgives us.  Then again, it is getting stoned to death, the end result imminent despite the harmless, fluffy means used to attain it.  Like death by a thousand papercuts.

We are taught that it is the Lord whom we are speaking to when we confess our sins.  The conduit, however, is a human being.  He is a man who sacrifices and struggles so much to walk a path of holiness for Him, for you.  To assail him with the vile things we do, one after another after another, and for him to forgive each and every one with love–I can see why Father came out of the Confessional so famished, so haggard, the way he did.

Which brings us to today’s Gospel: in John 16:29, Jesus’ disciples go phew! when the Lord finally stopped using figurative language and spoke very plainly.  I love how the Lord tells us stories that make us really think deeper.  But when we are too dense to get it, he just tells us straight out, in plain and simple talk.  Or, He shows us.

After bringing all our sins to the cross, before surrendering His spirit to the Father, Jesus said He was thirsty (John 19:28).  I do not think this is to be taken figuratively, but a literal, deliberate request for something to drink–some alleviation from the intense suffering He was enduring for our salvation.

It is the same suffering He burdens on those He called to forgive us today.


prisnothisow m Stoned to Death by Snacks

The Priest Is
Not His Own
by Fulton Sheen

thmyprbyfujs b Stoned to Death by Snacks

Those Mysterious
Priests
by Fulton Sheen

And more books at
Catholic Free Shipping
:

Holy
Orders

 

Bats in the Belfry

A very inspirational woman from the Diocese came to speak to our parents and sponsors last night, in this the final week before our Year II class gets “sealed with the Holy Spirit.”  She shared this joke with us as an introduction.  Upon hearing the punchline I knew I was going to share it with you here.  I shined up the story a bit from her original, but the point remains.

Bats in the Belfry

There was this cathedral that had a problem with bats in the belfry.  The youngest priest, newly ordained, wanted to impress the Bishop by taking a shot at getting rid of them.  He took the easiest, most practical, and humane approach.  He had them gathered into a net and released them in the nearby woods.  The bats, unfortunately, found their way back and reclaimed the belfry.

A second priest, who’s been at the cathedral a number of years, attempted a more drastic approach, knowing the Bishop expected more from him.  He gathered a posse of Knights of Columbus armed with two-by-fours and baseball bats and they assailed the belfry hoping to scare the pests away.  The bats, however, held their ground and even grew more aggressive than before.

Humbled, the two approached the wise Bishop.  He assured his subordinates that his plan was foolproof and even guaranteed that by the following morning, not only would the bats be gone, that they would also never return.

The next day, as the two doubtful priests approached the cathedral, they saw the Bishop on his way out.  And, sure enough, there was no more commotion of bats coming from the belfry–no sign of them anywhere.

The priests exclaimed, “Your excellency!  How did you get rid of all those bats?”

“Simple,” the Bishop grinned.  “I Confirmed them.”

Check out some Confirmation Gifts.

 

St. My Name’s Day

Yeah, yeah, I know… it’s St. Patrick’s Day. And I of all people should be celebrating it. But I’m not going to party. I’m not even wearing green today—partly because I didn’t remember to—and if I had remembered I probably wouldn’t have anyway. It is a Feast Day of a Saint of the Catholic Church, and with that, the day should be treated as such. St. Patrick’s contributions to our faith are remembered in my heart and mind, not in the color of my t-shirt or the mass quantities of Jameson consumed.

I wasn’t even supposed to be named Patrick.

I was named after my mother, who is Patricia. So technically I’m Patrick, Jr. (and yes, “junior” is correctly ascribed even though the name wasn’t passed from my father—it can apply to both, though my particular usage didn’t catch on).

I don’t know the whole story, and what I do know is at best blurry. I forget who told this to me—either my mother or grandmother, or maybe even a grandaunt—so for the sake of this posting I’m going to eschew further in-depth research and just fill in the holes with what makes sense, using my skills in creative fiction writing.

My mother was born on March 13 (belated happy birthday, Mom!) and my grandparents wanted to name her Marie Antoinette—yes, the one who got guillotined. Why, I don’t even know where to start trying to explain that one. But when they brought her in for baptism a few days later—where we as Catholics are officially named in the Church—it was March 17. Yes, St. Patrick’s Day. There must’ve been some sort of revelation and the name just rolled right off their tongues: they changed their mind and baptized her Maria Patricia.

So I could’ve been Anthony. Tony. (There’s another story from my father’s side where they changed their last name to escape some sort of persecution—so I could’ve been a whole different person altogether… but that’s another anecdote.)

On that note, the tradition of baptizing children with Biblical or religious names is dying out. All too often, parents are getting way too creative. By naming them Joshua, or Matthew, or Isaac, or Agnes, it is a gesture in which the parents are symbolically offering them entirely to God. The name is a way of thanking Him for the blessing of that child, and to remind us (and them) of their call to a life of holiness.

But I’m not discouraged. During the Rite of Confirmation, they can choose their own name from among the Saints who have served Him. In that act they stand on their own and affirm their faith to which their parents and Godparents were first entrusted.

 

I recently read a blog post from a fellow Catholic living on the other side of the country, who was responding to another article on the notion of “Sacramental Gatekeeping.” Namely, the original writer’s concern was that many diocesan Sacrament preparation courses are beginning to institute requirements that are too difficult to accomplish. At times, these may even be unnecessary or irrelevant to the particular Sacrament—put in only to ensure the recipient is serious about the process.

I wholly agree that there needs to be a program in place prior to receiving Sacraments. This way, the Church can be sure that those infants receiving Baptism will be raised by their parents and Godparents in the teachings of the faith. Those going to Reconciliation know the importance of mending their relationship with God, of confessing properly, and will be encouraged to seek it regularly. For First Communion, it is imperative the recipient acknowledge the true presence of Jesus so they can be in the proper state to receive Him. Our confirmandi need to be able to stand as adult Catholics and not fall to the wayside after being anointed. Those entering the vocations of Marriage and Holy Orders must adhere to their vows until death.

These programs have to be FIRM—but, fair. We do want recipients to know the value and importance of receiving them—and we also want them to receive Penance and Communion regularly. But, we do not want the process to be so stringent that those who do mean well drop out of a program because of technicalities—especially those that are irrelevant to the particular Sacrament.

The conservative Catholic in me has one qualm, however. I do not want to be that “holier-than-thou” guy, but I go to Reconciliation regularly enough to notice there is a disproportionate amount lining up outside confessionals on Saturday afternoons to those approaching the altar for Communion on Sunday mornings. For those of us who talk about defending our Sacraments, should we not be more scrutinizing about who receives Communion? One would think this would be more protected than the rest as we acknowledge the true presence of our Lord in the Eucharist.

For further reading, check out Fr. Peter Stravinskas’ Understanding the Sacraments.